• Introduction & Guide
    • Burne-Jones Studio
  • Artworks
  • Articles & Theses
  • Exhibitions
  • Bibliography
  • Names
    • Artists and People
    • Companies and Institutions
  • About
    • William Waters
    • Trustees
    • Sponsors
    • Contact
  • Donate
By Sir Edward Coley Burne-Jones
The Grosvenor Gallery New Bond Street - Gallery, Entrance and Library
Engraving
1877 - 1881
Collection Categories
Photographs and Ephemera
  • Expertise
  • Provenance
  • Exhibitions
  • Bibliography

The "seven blissfullest years of work" ended abruptly in
1877, when Burne-Jones contributed eight paintings
to the first exhibition at the newly built Grosvenor
Gallery. 1 Opened on May 1 in the heart of the
London art world at 135-7 New Bond Street (fig. 85),
the gallery was the brainchild of Sir Coutts Lindsay, Scottish
landowner, connoisseur, and an amateur artist himself. His
wife, Blanche, was also a talented painter, and it was she, a
Rothschild, who defrayed much of the buildings cost. The
Lindsays' intimate involvement with the project, which
included their own work and that of other titled amateurs
appearing at the annual exhibitions, gave it from the outset an
aristocratic tone. The private view was a great and well-pub-
licized social event, and the Prince and Princess of Wales
headed a glittering list of celebrity guests at the opening din-
ner. This was held in the basement restaurant, a novel and
popular amenity.

In keeping with the Lindsays' taste, the architect, W. J. Sams,
had designed a building in the Italian style; indeed, the door-
way was said to be by Palladio, having come from a demol-
ished church in Venice. 2 The decoration was so sumptuous
that it was generally considered to kill the pictures it had been
designed to enhance, but the lighting was sensitive, and the
introduction of electricity in 1882 was a great innovation. The
display of the pictures was equally revolutionary. At the Royal
Academy and other older institutions it was customary to
hang them like postage stamps from floor to ceiling and to
scatter an artist's exhibits. At the Grosvenor they were hung
together and given plenty of space to further increase their
impact. This was not the only way in which the Grosvenor set
out to be a liberal alternative to the Academy, which had since
1869 been established less than a mile away in Burlington
House, Piccadilly Whereas at the Academy an artist had to
submit his pictures to a committee, which had the power to
accept or reject them, at the Grosvenor artists were invited to
contribute by Sir Coutts and his two lieutenants, Charles
Hallé and Joseph Comyns Carr, who would tour the studios
beforehand, selecting suitable exhibits. The aim was to make
the Grosvenor a showcase for all that was most adventurous
in modern British art, and it was immediately perceived as the
flagship of the Aesthetic movement. Certainly Academicians
exhibited, including old Sir Francis Grant, the president,
Frederic Leighton, who was to succeed Grant the following
year to become the most prestigious holder of the office since
Reynolds, and his two fellow classicists Poynter and Alma-
Tadema. But Grant's aristocratic portraits were in keeping
with the social ethos, while the three classicists all in some
degree subscribed to the cult of beauty, which was synony-
mous with Aestheticism. Other progressive artists who showed
at the opening exhibition included Whistler, Moore, Watts,
Legros, Hubert von Herkomer, James Tissot (resident in
London since the Franco-Prussian War), and two exponents
of the Etruscan school of landscape painting, Leighton's
friend Giovanni Costa and Burne-Jones's former pupil and
current patron, George Howard. The older Pre-Raphaelite
generation was represented by Millais and Holman Hunt,
but Rossetti and Madox Brown declined to exhibit, Rossetti
objecting to the inclusion of Academicians and Brown
showing his usual touchiness.

In writing to the Grosvenor management to explain why he
could not participate, Rossetti paid generous tribute to
Burne-Jones, emphasizing that his association alone would
ensure the project s success. Even he, however, can hardly
have foreseen the truth of this prophecy. Burne-Jones's eight
pictures, all large in scale, were The Beguiling of Merlin (cat.
no. 64) and The Mirror of Venus (fig. 86), both of which
belonged to Leyland, The Days of Creation (fig. 79), which had
been bought by Graham, and five single standing figures:
Temperantia (1872-73; private collection), Fides (fig. 81), Spes
(1871-77; Art Gallery, Dunedin), A Sibyl (1877; private collec-
tion), and Saint George (cat. no. 85). All hung together in the
West Gallery, the main room on the first floor - the three
large compositions below, The Days of Creation in the middle,
and the single figures in a row above. It was an overwhelming
demonstration of his mature powers, all the more dramatic
since he had been absent from London galleries for so long.
Moreover, his own presence was supported by that of three
followers, Spencer Stanhope, J. M. Strudwick, and Walter
Crane, all of whom were also shown in the West Gallery, and
of two women who were working in the same tradition, Marie
Spartali (1844-1927) and Evelyn Pickering (1855-1919); one of
the virtues of the Grosvenor was that it supported and pro-
moted women artists. In other words, an entire school sud-
denly seemed to have emerged, with Burne-Jones as its
undisputed leader. No other artist on display could compete.
Overnight he was famous, the star of the Grosvenor and the
doyen of Aestheticism in its fully developed form.

Stephen Wildman
10/01/2019
Title Author/Editor Year Page No. & Illustrations Attachments
Edward Burne-Jones: Victorian Artist-Dreamer John Christian, Stephen Wildman, Laurence des Cars, Alan Crawford, Philippe de Montebello, Irene Bizot, Graham Allen, Henri Loyrette 1998
pp. 191-193 illus fig. 85 p. 191
Art as Lived Religion: Edward Burne-Jones as Painter, Priest, Pilgrim, and Monk Colette Michelle Crossman 2007
Cross-Channel Dialogues: Antinaturalism in Britain and France, c. 1878-1898 Dr Rachel Sloan 2007
The Last Pre-Raphaelite, Edward Burne-Jones and the Victorian Imagination Fiona MacCarthy 2011
Illus pl. XXII between pp. 358-359 and pls. 3, 8, 9, 13, 15, 20, 21, 22, 23, 28, 30, 31, 32, 33 between pp. 486-487 and in the text pp. 71, 181, 192, 203, 238, 256, 268, 329, 371, 425, 439, 449, 466 pp. 1-17, 20-24, 26-66, 68-95, 97, 103, 109, 111-118, 120-122, 124-141, 143-145, 147-154, 156-168, 170, 172-203, 205, 207, 209-232, 234-242, 244-247, 248-252, 254-255, 257, 259-276, 278-279, 281-307, 309-317, 319-321, 323-350, 357-361, 363-384, 387-389, 395, 398-400, 402, 405-416, 418-433, 437-441, 451-472, 475-476, 478-481, 483, 485, 487-497, 498, 500-501, 504-517, 522-523, 525-530, 534, 536
Edward Burne-Jones Tate Britain 24 October 2018 - 24 February 2019 Dr Alison Smith, Dr Tim Batchelor, Dr Suzanne Elizabeth Fagence Cooper, Professor Colin Cruise, Charlotte Mary Helen Gere, Professor Elizabeth Prettejohn, Nicholas Tromans 2018
illus p. 218
The Radical Vision of Edward Burne-Jones Dr. Andrea Wolk Rager 2022
illus p. 80 fig. 35


©2020 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
All images may be subject to copyright
TERMS & CONDITIONS. PRIVACY POLICY. COOKIE POLICY.